Development Priorities: Refactor, RAG, Or Case Management?

by ADMIN 59 views

Hey guys! We're at a crossroads with our project, and it's time to make some crucial decisions about our next steps. We've nailed the core teaching flow – the four-act teaching method combined with Socratic dialogue – but now we need to figure out where to focus our energy. As developers, we need to strike a balance between our technical aspirations and delivering real value to our users. So, let's dive into the options, weigh the pros and cons, and figure out the best path forward.

🎯 Project Background

Our current project boasts a solid core teaching process, blending the four-act teaching method with the engaging Socratic dialogue. However, we're facing a pivotal decision point: What's the most strategic direction for our next phase of development? This decision demands a careful balance between our technical ideals and the practical needs and value we can offer our users.

πŸ“Š Comparing the Three Development Paths

We've got three potential routes to explore, each with its own set of opportunities and challenges. Let's break them down:

Option A: Architectural Refactoring – Laying the Groundwork for Cross-Disciplinary Expansion

Goal: To refactor our existing legal system into a modular, plugin-based architecture. This would pave the way for rapid expansion into other academic disciplines.

Technical Approach:

  • Abstracting the core engine: This involves creating a unified core that encompasses our dialogue, RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation), knowledge graph, and assessment engines.
  • Developing modular subject plugins: We'd treat each discipline (law, medicine, engineering, etc.) as an independent plugin, ensuring flexibility and scalability.
  • Establishing open APIs: This would allow for third-party integration, expanding the platform's ecosystem.

Advantages:

  • βœ… Elegant and Scalable Architecture: We'd be building a more robust and adaptable system, ready to handle future growth.
  • βœ… Future-Proofing for Cross-Disciplinary Expansion: This refactor would lay the groundwork for seamlessly integrating new subject areas.
  • βœ… Enhanced Code Reusability: A modular design means less duplicated effort and lower long-term maintenance costs.

Disadvantages:

  • ❌ Lengthy Development Cycle: This is a significant undertaking, estimated to take 2-3 weeks.
  • ❌ Limited Short-Term User Impact: Users won't immediately see or feel the benefits of this purely technical enhancement.
  • ❌ Over-Engineering Risk: We might be building for a future that doesn't materialize, leading to wasted effort.

Estimated Workload: 2-3 weeks

Option B: RAG + Knowledge Graph – A Technological Leap Forward

Goal: To enhance our system by integrating Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and knowledge graph technologies. This aims to improve the quality of AI responses and boost reasoning capabilities.

Technical Approach:

  • Implementing a vector database: We'd leverage tools like Chroma or Qdrant, combined with an embedding model such as BGE-large-zh, to store and retrieve information efficiently.
  • Constructing a legal knowledge base: This involves curating a vast repository of legal data, including over 300,000 statutes, precedents, and scholarly articles.
  • Developing a knowledge graph: Using Neo4j, we'd map out legal concepts and their relationships, enabling more sophisticated reasoning.
  • Visualizing reasoning paths: We'd provide users with a clear view of how the system arrives at its conclusions.

Advantages:

  • βœ… Cutting-Edge Technology: This aligns us with the latest advancements in AI and natural language processing.
  • βœ… Improved Legal Citation Accuracy: We anticipate boosting the accuracy of legal citations from 65% to 90%.
  • βœ… Exciting New Features: This opens the door to features like similar case recommendations and visualized reasoning paths.
  • βœ… Enhanced Technical Reputation: Adopting these technologies can improve our image and attract investment or grants.

Disadvantages:

  • ❌ Extended Development Timeline: Implementing RAG and a knowledge graph is a significant project, estimated to take 2-3 weeks for RAG and an additional 3-4 weeks for the knowledge graph.
  • ❌ High Technical Risk: These are relatively new technologies, and we may encounter unforeseen challenges.
  • ❌ Subtle User Impact: The improvements, while significant, might be perceived as "more accurate" rather than "incredibly useful."
  • ❌ Increased Costs: We'll need to factor in the expenses associated with vector and graph databases.

Estimated Workload: RAG (2-3 weeks), Knowledge Graph (3-4 weeks)

Option C: Case Management System + Real User Database ⭐ Recommended

Goal: To close the product feedback loop by allowing users to save their learning records, review progress reports, and build long-term engagement.

Core Functionalities:

  1. Case Storage: Users can permanently save uploaded cases for future review.
  2. Learning Records: Track study time, progress, and quiz results.
  3. Learning Reports:
    • Total study time and cases completed.
    • Knowledge mastery (based on learning data analysis).
    • Visualized learning trends.
  4. Personalized Learning Path Recommendations: Suggest next steps based on learning data.
  5. User Database: Enable user registration, login, and personal profiles.

Technical Approach:

-- Core table structure
cases (id, userId, title, content, status, uploadedAt, lastStudiedAt)
study_records (id, caseId, userId, actNumber, timeSpent, score)
users (id, username, email, passwordHash, createdAt)

Advantages:

  • βœ… Immediate User Value: Directly addresses the pain point of lost learning records.
  • βœ… Low Technical Risk: We're working with familiar technologies: SQLite, Zustand, and Next.js API.
  • βœ… Short Development Cycle: We can get an MVP up and running in 3-5 days and fully refine it in a week.
  • βœ… Fosters User Retention: Users are more likely to stick around when their data is stored and accessible.
  • βœ… Clear Commercial Value: User data opens up opportunities for monetization.
  • βœ… Data Foundation for Future Optimizations: Understanding user behavior is crucial for refining our system, especially RAG.

Disadvantages:

  • ❌ Less "Cool" Technology: This option might not be as flashy as RAG or knowledge graphs, but it's what users actually need.
  • ❌ Limited Short-Term Technical Showcase: It won't immediately demonstrate cutting-edge tech to investors or stakeholders.

Estimated Workload: 3-5 days for MVP, 1 week for refined experience

πŸ€” Decision-Making Criteria

To make the best choice, let's consider these critical perspectives:

From the User's Perspective: What's the Most Pressing Need?

User Scenario:

Imagine a student, let's call him Alex, who spends hours studying a complex contract dispute case. A week later, Alex wants to revisit the case.

  • ❌ Without a Case Management System: Alex would have to hunt down the original materials and potentially re-upload everything – a frustrating waste of time.
  • βœ… With a Case Management System: Alex can simply log in, access their "My Cases" library, and pick up right where they left off. A seamless and satisfying experience.

What Features Will Users Pay For?

  • RAG for greater accuracy? (Possibly not, as free options might be sufficient).
  • A record of their learning progress? (More likely to pay, as this solves a tangible problem).

From a Business Standpoint: Which Feature Offers the Quickest Validation?

Dimension Refactoring RAG/KG Case Management
Development Cycle 2-3 weeks 4-6 weeks 3-5 days
User Value Unnoticeable +20% +80%
Paid Conversion 0 +10% +50%
User Retention ⭐ ⭐⭐ ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Business Validation Slow Slow Fast (in 5 days)

From a Technical Angle: Which Option Carries the Least Risk?

  • Refactoring: Risk of over-engineering and creating unnecessary complexity.
  • RAG/KG: Risk of technical hurdles and unforeseen challenges with new technologies.
  • Case Management: Minimal risk, as we're working with familiar technologies and proven approaches.

πŸ’‘ Key Insights

Why Prioritize Case Management Before RAG?

Case Storage β†’ Real User Data β†’ User Behavior Analysis β†’ Identification of Actual Needs β†’ Targeted RAG Implementation

Without Data, You're Flying Blind with RAG Optimization:

  • Case storage reveals the most frequently studied cases.
  • Behavioral data pinpoints where users struggle.
  • This data informs precise and effective RAG improvements.

Example:

  • If users frequently search for "contract validity," we should prioritize optimizing RAG for that specific area.
  • If users get stuck on "evidence analysis," we should bolster the knowledge graph related to evidence.
  • If the "timeline analysis" feature is rarely used, it might not warrant significant investment.

🎯 Recommended Strategy: Phased Implementation

Let's break down our development into manageable stages for optimal results.

Phase 1: Case Management System (This Week, 3-5 Days)

  • Day 1-2: Database Design + API Development
  • Day 3-4: Front-End UI (My Cases/Case Details/Learning Reports)
  • Day 5: Testing + Deployment

Phase 2: Learning Analysis Enhancement (Next Week)

  • Knowledge Point Tagging (Manual)
  • Mastery Algorithm (Calculate Student Success Rates)
  • Learning Path Recommendations (Rule-Based)

Phase 3: RAG System (2 Weeks Out, Data-Driven)

  • Vector Database Deployment
  • Legal Code Vectorization
  • Similarity Retrieval Implementation

Phase 4: Knowledge Graph (1 Month Out)

  • Entity Recognition (Legal Codes/Cases/Concepts)
  • Relationship Extraction
  • Reasoning Path Visualization

Phase 5: Architectural Refactoring (3 Months Out, As Needed)

  • Abstract Core Engine
  • Implement Subject-Specific Plugins
  • Open APIs for Third-Party Integration

πŸ™‹ Discussion Points

Let's get the discussion flowing and make the best decision for our project.

  1. From a product perspective: Which feature truly alleviates user pain points?
  2. From a business perspective: Which feature provides the quickest path to business model validation?
  3. From a technical perspective: Which feature presents the lowest risk and the highest ROI?
  4. From a strategic perspective: Which path makes the most sense in the long run?

πŸ“ Expected Outcome

Alright, team, it's time to cast your votes and share your reasoning! Let's collaborate and decide on the most impactful course of action. I’m eager to hear your thoughts.

  • [ ] Option A: Architectural Refactoring
  • [ ] Option B: RAG + Knowledge Graph
  • [ ] Option C: Case Management System (Recommended)
  • [ ] Other (Please Specify)

Suggested Tags: priority:high, discussion, technical-decision, product-strategy